Difference between revisions of "Talk:ECE 382/Spring 2011"

Latest revision as of 00:42, 4 January 2013

Is there a preference for using the exact formula for settling time versus the approximation Ts~4/(zeta*omega)? Or can we use whichever we please? Tjs25 04:09, 14 February 2011 (EST)
- Generally, the approximation is fine for damping ratios between 0 and 0.9. Above that, probably best to use the actual formula. DukeEgr93 12:52, 14 February 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 17:52, 14 February 2011 (view source) DukeEgr93 (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 00:42, 4 January 2013 (view source) DukeEgr93 (talk \| contribs) m
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* Is there a preference for using the exact formula for settling time versus the approximation Ts~4/(zeta*omega)? Or can we use whichever we please? [[User:Tjs25\|Tjs25]] 04:09, 14 February 2011 (EST)		* Is there a preference for using the exact formula for settling time versus the approximation Ts~4/(zeta*omega)? Or can we use whichever we please? [[User:Tjs25\|Tjs25]] 04:09, 14 February 2011 (EST)
−	** Generally, the approximation is fine for damping ~~rations~~ between 0 and 0.9. Above that, probably best to use the actual formula. [[User:DukeEgr93\|DukeEgr93]] 12:52, 14 February 2011 (EST)	+	** Generally, the approximation is fine for damping ratios between 0 and 0.9. Above that, probably best to use the actual formula. [[User:DukeEgr93\|DukeEgr93]] 12:52, 14 February 2011 (EST)