Difference between revisions of "EGR 103/Fall 2019/Minilab 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == References / Hints == | ||
* Problem 2.5.1 | * Problem 2.5.1 | ||
− | ** To load data | + | ** To load data from an Excel file with headers: |
::<syntaxhighlight lang=python> | ::<syntaxhighlight lang=python> | ||
import pandas | import pandas | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
* Problem 2.5.4 | * Problem 2.5.4 | ||
− | ** [https://matplotlib.org/3.1.1/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.pyplot.semilogx.html ] at [https://matplotlib.org matplotlib.org] | + | ** [https://matplotlib.org/3.1.1/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.pyplot.semilogx.html matplotlib.pyplot.semilogx] at [https://matplotlib.org matplotlib.org] |
** [[Python:Extrema]] | ** [[Python:Extrema]] | ||
** [[Python:Finding roots]] | ** [[Python:Finding roots]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Partial Solutions == | ||
+ | * Problem 2.5.1 | ||
+ | ** Biggest difference happens at about $$x=30$$. | ||
+ | ** Estimates of $$f(50)$$ are 0.471 and 0.521 for natural and not-a-knot, respectively. | ||
+ | * Problem 2.5.2 | ||
+ | ** Total force is about 4e9; LOA is in the high 20s. | ||
+ | * Problem 2.5.3 | ||
+ | ** Exact answer is 1104. | ||
+ | ** Simps is always better than trapz except for $$n=2$$, where they are the same. | ||
+ | ** After about $$n=1$$ the true percent error goes to almost 0 based on scale of the graph. | ||
+ | * Problem 2.5.4 | ||
+ | ** The plot looks like someone started drawing a duck from the back of the neck over the head and out to the end of the bill, then stopped. | ||
+ | ** The maximum value on the graph is about 6. | ||
+ | ** The maximum value of the absolute value of the transfer function is about 2. Note that $$20\log_{10}(2)=6.02$$, which explains why the max of the graph is where it is. | ||
+ | ** The cutoff frequencies are at approximately 10 and 1450. |
Revision as of 03:21, 3 December 2019
References / Hints
- Problem 2.5.1
- To load data from an Excel file with headers:
import pandas # %% Load data edata = pandas.read_excel("file.xlsx") col_1_stuff = edata.values[:, 0].copy() col_2_stuff = edata.values[:, 1].copy()
- Problem 2.5.2
- scipy.integrate.simps at docs.scipy.org
- Note that the denominator in the line of action calculation is $$f_t$$, which you already calculated.
- If you want to see a graph of the cross section (i.e. Figure 19.9(b)), assuming you call the height above the bottom $$z$$ and the width at that height $$wz$$, you can add the following code:
fig = plt.figure(num=1, clear=True) ax = fig.add_subplot(1, 1, 1) zval = np.block([z[::-1], z[:]]) wval = np.block([-wz[::-1] / 2, wz[:] / 2]) ax.plot(wval, zval, "k-") ax.axis("equal")
- Problem 2.5.3
- scipy.integrate.trapz at docs.scipy.org
- scipy.integrate.simps at docs.scipy.org
- Since $$n$$ goes from 2 to 30, it is not exactly what you need for an index to an array...think carefully about how to store things.
- Problem 2.5.4
Partial Solutions
- Problem 2.5.1
- Biggest difference happens at about $$x=30$$.
- Estimates of $$f(50)$$ are 0.471 and 0.521 for natural and not-a-knot, respectively.
- Problem 2.5.2
- Total force is about 4e9; LOA is in the high 20s.
- Problem 2.5.3
- Exact answer is 1104.
- Simps is always better than trapz except for $$n=2$$, where they are the same.
- After about $$n=1$$ the true percent error goes to almost 0 based on scale of the graph.
- Problem 2.5.4
- The plot looks like someone started drawing a duck from the back of the neck over the head and out to the end of the bill, then stopped.
- The maximum value on the graph is about 6.
- The maximum value of the absolute value of the transfer function is about 2. Note that $$20\log_{10}(2)=6.02$$, which explains why the max of the graph is where it is.
- The cutoff frequencies are at approximately 10 and 1450.